使用Scipy.optimize最小化SSE最小化

问题描述 投票:1回答:1

我试图使用scipy.optimize优化函数的SSE(平方误差之和)。为了测试,我创建了一个简单的问题,如下面的代码。但是scipy输出的优化参数决不会使SSE = 0。有人可以帮我理解,我哪里错了。

我试图用我的代码计算的SSE和excel中计算的SSE进行交叉检查。它匹配。然后我使用最小化函数来最小化SSE函数,由Scipy计算的那些与手计算的函数不匹配。我以前的功能是形式(y = ax + b)。下面是代码

import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize


e=np.array([0,2])
sig1=np.array([0,200])
k = [10,10]
#n = 0.2
coe=np.array([k[0],k[1]])

def sig2(e):
    v=(k[0]*e)+ k[1]
    SEzip = zip(sig1, v)
    sse = 0
    for y in SEzip:
        sse += np.power((y[0] - y[1]),2)
    return sse

print (sig2(e))
def f(coe):
   print(coe)
   return f
result = minimize(sig2,coe,method='Nelder-Mead',callback=(f),options={'xtol': 1e-6,'ftol':1e-06,'maxiter':50000,'disp': True,'adaptive' : True})

print(result)
python-3.x scipy mathematical-optimization minimization scipy-optimize
1个回答
0
投票

你在这里打印你的x0 aka coe,我编辑你的代码并将你的目标函数sig2()缩短为一行然后编辑你的回调以显示测试的变量及其等效的目标函数值。现在你可以清楚地看到sse=0到达了。

import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# for prettier numpy prints
np.set_printoptions(precision = 6)

# init 
e    = np.array([0,2])
sig1 = np.array([0,200])
k    = [10, 10]
coe  = np.array([k[0], k[1]])

# define objective function
def sig2(e):
    return sum([np.power((y[0] - y[1]), 2) for y in zip(sig1, (k[0]*e)+ k[1])])

# define callback
def f(e):
   print("e: %25s | sig2(e): %5s" % (e,round(sig2(e), 6)))

# optimize
result = minimize(sig2,
                  coe,
                  method   = 'Nelder-Mead',
                  callback = f,
                  options  = {'xtol': 1e-6,'ftol':1e-06,
                              'maxiter':50000,'disp': True,'adaptive' : True})

print(result)

输出:

...
e:     [-1.000053 18.999751] | sig2(e): 6e-06
e:     [-1.000062 19.000109] | sig2(e): 2e-06
e:     [-1.000062 19.000109] | sig2(e): 2e-06
e:     [-1.000062 19.000109] | sig2(e): 2e-06
e:     [-0.999934 18.999981] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.000049 18.999979] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.000027 19.000044] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-0.999986 18.999996] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-0.999986 18.999996] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-0.999986 18.999996] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.000009 18.999993] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.000009 18.999993] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-0.999995 19.      ] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-0.999995 19.      ] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.000003 18.999998] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.       19.000002] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-0.999998 19.      ] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.000001 18.999999] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-1.       19.000001] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:     [-0.999999 19.      ] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:                 [-1. 19.] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:                 [-1. 19.] | sig2(e):   0.0
e:                 [-1. 19.] | sig2(e):   0.0
Optimization terminated successfully.
         Current function value: 0.000000
         Iterations: 56
         Function evaluations: 110
 final_simplex: (array([[-1., 19.],
       [-1., 19.],
       [-1., 19.]]), array([6.221143e-12, 1.914559e-11, 1.946860e-11]))
           fun: 6.2211434216849394e-12
       message: 'Optimization terminated successfully.'
          nfev: 110
           nit: 56
        status: 0
       success: True
             x: array([-1., 19.])
© www.soinside.com 2019 - 2024. All rights reserved.