Googlemock EXPECT_CALL 失败并出现错误:“operator==”不匹配(操作数类型为“const XX”

问题描述 投票:0回答:1

我第一次使用 googlemock/test。编译错误是由于以下行:

EXPECT_CALL(orderWriter, writeOrders(aNonZeroSizeOrder))
    .Times(1);

错误:

error: 不匹配 'operator==' 操作数类型是 'const Order' 和 'const Order' 'const Order' 不是从 'const std::istream_iterator<_Tp, _CharT, _Traits, _Dist>'

派生的

注:候选:template bool std::operator==(const std::set<_Key, _Compare, _Alloc>&, const std::set<_Key, _Compare, _Alloc>&)

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/7.4.0/include/c++/bits/stl_algobase.h:800:22:注意:“const Order”不是从“const std::pair<_T1, _T2>”派生的 如果 (!(*__first1 == *__first2)) ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~

如果我评论它,编译成功。 我在使用 const ref 参数定义 Mock 方法时做错了什么吗?


class Order
{
    //represents an order
};

class OrderWriter
{
public:
    virtual void writeOrders(const std::vector<Order>& allOrders)
    {
        // ... writes the orders somewhere ...
    }
};

class OrderStore
{
public:
    virtual std::vector<Order> getOrders() const
    {
        // ... returns an array of orders ...
    }
};

class SimpleOrderManager
{
public:
    void writeAllOrders(OrderStore& orderStore, OrderWriter& orderWriter)
    {
        std::vector<Order> allOrders = orderStore.getOrders();

        if(allOrders.size() == 0)
            throw "No orders in store";
        orderWriter.writeOrders(allOrders);
    }
};

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//Need to mock class OrderStore as we need to return vector
//without changing original class OrderStore which is not implemented (thus not returning vector)
class MockOrderStore : public OrderStore
{
public:
    MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(getOrders, std::vector<Order> () );
};

//To check if OrderWriter::writeOrders() is called
class MockOrderWriter : public OrderWriter
{
public:
    MOCK_METHOD1(writeOrders, void (const std::vector<Order>& ) );
};

TEST(SimpleOrderManager_TestCase,  expect_call_writeOrders )
{
    std::vector<Order> aNonZeroSizeOrder{Order()};
    MockOrderStore  aMockOrderStore;
    MockOrderWriter aMockOrderWriter;
    SimpleOrderManager aSMO;
    //Call MockOrderStore::getOrders() not OrderStore::getOrders()
    //as we need to return empty vector without changing original class OrderStore
    EXPECT_CALL(aMockOrderStore, getOrders)
    .Times(1)
    .WillOnce(Return(aNonZeroSizeOrder));

/*i**************ERROR in this line **************************/
    EXPECT_CALL(aMockOrderWriter, writeOrders(aNonZeroSizeOrder)).Times(1);

    aSMO.writeAllOrders(aMockOrderStore, aMockOrderWriter);
}```

EDIT: Problems solved when I pass "_" instead of parameter as suggested by @PiotrNycz
It works when I change like this:
EXPECT_CALL(aMockOrderWriter, writeOrders(_)).Times(1);
googletest googlemock
1个回答
2
投票

当你写这篇文章时:


EXPECT_CALL(orderWriter, writeOrders(aNonZeroSizeOrder))
    .Times(1);

Googlemock 理解这一点:


EXPECT_CALL(orderWriter, writeOrders(::testing::Eq(aNonZeroSizeOrder)))
//                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    .Times(1);

这是因为

EXPECT_CALL()
的参数中的 googlemock 期望匹配器 - 而不是值。当您提供简单的值时 - 它们会“静静地”转换为
::testing::Eq(value)
.

返回的匹配器

这样的

Eq
匹配器是用
operator==
实现的 - 所以你有错误。

你有两种解决方法:

  1. operator ==
    添加到您的价值等级
  2. 使用其他匹配器 - 比如
    ::testing::Field
    - 或者只是
    ::testing::_
    看看我是对的。

可用匹配器的完整列表在这里:CheatSheet.md#matchers

© www.soinside.com 2019 - 2024. All rights reserved.