我第一次使用 googlemock/test。编译错误是由于以下行:
EXPECT_CALL(orderWriter, writeOrders(aNonZeroSizeOrder))
.Times(1);
error: 不匹配 'operator==' 操作数类型是 'const Order' 和 'const Order' 'const Order' 不是从 'const std::istream_iterator<_Tp, _CharT, _Traits, _Dist>'
派生的/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/7.4.0/include/c++/bits/stl_algobase.h:800:22:注意:“const Order”不是从“const std::pair<_T1, _T2>”派生的 如果 (!(*__first1 == *__first2)) ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
如果我评论它,编译成功。 我在使用 const ref 参数定义 Mock 方法时做错了什么吗?
class Order
{
//represents an order
};
class OrderWriter
{
public:
virtual void writeOrders(const std::vector<Order>& allOrders)
{
// ... writes the orders somewhere ...
}
};
class OrderStore
{
public:
virtual std::vector<Order> getOrders() const
{
// ... returns an array of orders ...
}
};
class SimpleOrderManager
{
public:
void writeAllOrders(OrderStore& orderStore, OrderWriter& orderWriter)
{
std::vector<Order> allOrders = orderStore.getOrders();
if(allOrders.size() == 0)
throw "No orders in store";
orderWriter.writeOrders(allOrders);
}
};
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//Need to mock class OrderStore as we need to return vector
//without changing original class OrderStore which is not implemented (thus not returning vector)
class MockOrderStore : public OrderStore
{
public:
MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(getOrders, std::vector<Order> () );
};
//To check if OrderWriter::writeOrders() is called
class MockOrderWriter : public OrderWriter
{
public:
MOCK_METHOD1(writeOrders, void (const std::vector<Order>& ) );
};
TEST(SimpleOrderManager_TestCase, expect_call_writeOrders )
{
std::vector<Order> aNonZeroSizeOrder{Order()};
MockOrderStore aMockOrderStore;
MockOrderWriter aMockOrderWriter;
SimpleOrderManager aSMO;
//Call MockOrderStore::getOrders() not OrderStore::getOrders()
//as we need to return empty vector without changing original class OrderStore
EXPECT_CALL(aMockOrderStore, getOrders)
.Times(1)
.WillOnce(Return(aNonZeroSizeOrder));
/*i**************ERROR in this line **************************/
EXPECT_CALL(aMockOrderWriter, writeOrders(aNonZeroSizeOrder)).Times(1);
aSMO.writeAllOrders(aMockOrderStore, aMockOrderWriter);
}```
EDIT: Problems solved when I pass "_" instead of parameter as suggested by @PiotrNycz
It works when I change like this:
EXPECT_CALL(aMockOrderWriter, writeOrders(_)).Times(1);
当你写这篇文章时:
EXPECT_CALL(orderWriter, writeOrders(aNonZeroSizeOrder))
.Times(1);
Googlemock 理解这一点:
EXPECT_CALL(orderWriter, writeOrders(::testing::Eq(aNonZeroSizeOrder)))
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.Times(1);
这是因为
EXPECT_CALL()
的参数中的 googlemock 期望匹配器 - 而不是值。当您提供简单的值时 - 它们会“静静地”转换为 ::testing::Eq(value)
. 返回的匹配器
这样的
Eq
匹配器是用operator==
实现的 - 所以你有错误。
你有两种解决方法:
operator ==
添加到您的价值等级::testing::Field
- 或者只是 ::testing::_
看看我是对的。可用匹配器的完整列表在这里:CheatSheet.md#matchers