TensorFlow 2.0：如何使用tf.keras对图表进行分组？ tf.name_scope / tf.variable_scope不再使用了？

Question

回到TensorFlow <2.0，我们用来定义图层，特别是更复杂的设置，例如初始模块，通过将它们与tf.name_scope或tf.variable_scope分组。

利用这些运算符，我们能够方便地构建计算图，这使得TensorBoard的图表视图可以更容易解释。

只是结构化群体的一个例子：

这对于调试复杂的体系结构非常方便。

不幸的是，tf.keras似乎忽略了tf.name_scope而tf.variable_scope在TensorFlow> = 2.0时消失了。因此，像这样的解决方案......

with tf.variable_scope("foo"):
    with tf.variable_scope("bar"):
        v = tf.get_variable("v", [1])
        assert v.name == "foo/bar/v:0"

...不再可用。有替代品吗？

我们如何在TensorFlow> = 2.0中对图层和整个模型进行分组？如果我们不对图层进行分组，那么tf.keras只会将所有内容串行放置在图表视图中，从而为复杂模型创建一个大混乱。

是否有tf.variable_scope的替代品？到目前为止我找不到任何东西，但在TensorFlow <2.0中大量使用了该方法。

---

编辑：我现在已经为TensorFlow 2.0实现了一个示例。这是使用tf.keras实现的简单GAN：

# Generator
G_inputs = tk.Input(shape=(100,), name=f"G_inputs")

x = tk.layers.Dense(7 * 7 * 16)(G_inputs)
x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
x = tk.layers.Flatten()(x)
x = tk.layers.Reshape((7, 7, 16))(x)

x = tk.layers.Conv2DTranspose(32, (3, 3), padding="same")(x)
x = tk.layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
x = tf.image.resize(x, (14, 14))

x = tk.layers.Conv2DTranspose(32, (3, 3), padding="same")(x)
x = tk.layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
x = tf.image.resize(x, (28, 28))

x = tk.layers.Conv2DTranspose(32, (3, 3), padding="same")(x)
x = tk.layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)

x = tk.layers.Conv2DTranspose(1, (3, 3), padding="same")(x)
x = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)

G_model = tk.Model(inputs=G_inputs,
                   outputs=x,
                   name="G")
G_model.summary()

# Discriminator
D_inputs = tk.Input(shape=(28, 28, 1), name=f"D_inputs")

x = tk.layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), padding="same")(D_inputs)
x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
x = tk.layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2))(x)
x = tk.layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), padding="same")(x)
x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
x = tk.layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2))(x)
x = tk.layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), padding="same")(x)
x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)

x = tk.layers.Flatten()(x)

x = tk.layers.Dense(128)(x)
x = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)
x = tk.layers.Dense(64)(x)
x = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)
x = tk.layers.Dense(1)(x)
x = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)

D_model = tk.Model(inputs=D_inputs,
                   outputs=x,
                   name="D")

D_model.compile(optimizer=tk.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-5, beta_1=0.5, name="Adam_D"),
                loss="binary_crossentropy")
D_model.summary()

GAN = tk.Sequential()
GAN.add(G_model)
GAN.add(D_model)
GAN.compile(optimizer=tk.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-5, beta_1=0.5, name="Adam_GAN"),
            loss="binary_crossentropy")

tb = tk.callbacks.TensorBoard(log_dir="./tb_tf2.0", write_graph=True)

# dummy data
noise = np.random.rand(100, 100).astype(np.float32)
target = np.ones(shape=(100, 1), dtype=np.float32)

GAN.fit(x=noise,
        y=target,
        callbacks=[tb])

TensorBoard中这些模型的图形看起来像this。层次只是一个完整的混乱，模型“G”和“D”（在右侧）涵盖了一些混乱。 “GAN”完全缺失。无法正确打开训练操作“Adam”：从左到右绘制了太多层，并在整个地方绘制了箭头。很难通过这种方式检查GAN的正确性。

---

虽然相同GAN的TensorFlow 1.X实现涵盖了许多“样板代码”......

# Generator
Z = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 100], name="Z")


def model_G(inputs, reuse=False):
    with tf.variable_scope("G", reuse=reuse):
        x = tf.layers.dense(inputs, 7 * 7 * 16)
        x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
        x = tf.reshape(x, (-1, 7, 7, 16))

        x = tf.layers.conv2d_transpose(x, 32, (3, 3), padding="same")
        x = tf.layers.batch_normalization(x)
        x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
        x = tf.image.resize_images(x, (14, 14))

        x = tf.layers.conv2d_transpose(x, 32, (3, 3), padding="same")
        x = tf.layers.batch_normalization(x)
        x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
        x = tf.image.resize_images(x, (28, 28))

        x = tf.layers.conv2d_transpose(x, 32, (3, 3), padding="same")
        x = tf.layers.batch_normalization(x)
        x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)

        x = tf.layers.conv2d_transpose(x, 1, (3, 3), padding="same")
        G_logits = x
        G_out = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)

    return G_logits, G_out


# Discriminator
D_in = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 28, 28, 1], name="D_in")


def model_D(inputs, reuse=False):
    with tf.variable_scope("D", reuse=reuse):
        with tf.variable_scope("conv"):
            x = tf.layers.conv2d(inputs, 32, (3, 3), padding="same")
            x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
            x = tf.layers.max_pooling2d(x, (2, 2), (2, 2))
            x = tf.layers.conv2d(x, 32, (3, 3), padding="same")
            x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)
            x = tf.layers.max_pooling2d(x, (2, 2), (2, 2))
            x = tf.layers.conv2d(x, 64, (3, 3), padding="same")
            x = tf.nn.leaky_relu(x)

        with tf.variable_scope("dense"):
            x = tf.reshape(x, (-1, 7 * 7 * 64))

            x = tf.layers.dense(x, 128)
            x = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)
            x = tf.layers.dense(x, 64)
            x = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)
            x = tf.layers.dense(x, 1)
            D_logits = x
            D_out = tf.nn.sigmoid(x)

    return D_logits, D_out

# models
G_logits, G_out = model_G(Z)
D_logits, D_out = model_D(D_in)
GAN_logits, GAN_out = model_D(G_out, reuse=True)

# losses
target = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 1], name="target")
d_loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=D_logits, labels=target))
gan_loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=GAN_logits, labels=target))

# train ops
train_d = tf.train.AdamOptimizer(learning_rate=1e-5, name="AdamD") \
    .minimize(d_loss, var_list=tf.get_collection(tf.GraphKeys.GLOBAL_VARIABLES, scope="D"))
train_gan = tf.train.AdamOptimizer(learning_rate=1e-5, name="AdamGAN") \
    .minimize(gan_loss, var_list=tf.get_collection(tf.GraphKeys.GLOBAL_VARIABLES, scope="G"))

# dummy data
dat_noise = np.random.rand(100, 100).astype(np.float32)
dat_target = np.ones(shape=(100, 1), dtype=np.float32)

sess = tf.Session()
tf_init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess.run(tf_init)

# merged = tf.summary.merge_all()
writer = tf.summary.FileWriter("./tb_tf1.0", sess.graph)

ret = sess.run([gan_loss, train_gan], feed_dict={Z: dat_noise, target: dat_target})

...由此产生的TensorBoard graph看起来相当清洁。请注意清洁的“AdamD”和“AdamGAN”范围是如何在右上方。您可以直接检查优化器是否附加到正确的范围/梯度。

Answer 1

根据社区RFC Variables in TensorFlow 2.0：

• 控制变量命名的用户可以使用tf.name_scope + tf.Variable

实际上，tf.name_scope仍然存在于TensorFlow 2.0中，因此您可以这样做：

with tf.name_scope("foo"):
    with tf.name_scope("bar"):
        v = tf.Variable([0], dtype=tf.float32, name="v")
        assert v.name == "foo/bar/v:0"

此外，如上所述：

• var_scope和get_variable的tf 1.0版本将保留在tf.compat.v1中

所以，如果你真的需要，你可以回到tf.compat.v1.variable_scope和tf.compat.v1.get_variable。

变量范围和tf.get_variable可以很方便，但是有很小的陷阱和角落情况，特别是因为它们的行为相似但不完全像名称范围，它实际上是一个并行的机制。我认为只有名称范围将更加一致和直接。