在以下示例中，
@为什么数字1到9的间隔被切割为0,3,6,9， @尽管两种情况下的表示类似，但0.1到0.9的数字间隔被切割为0.1,0.2,0.6和0.9 @？为什么？ ---见输出
cbind(
seq( from = 1, to = 9, by = 1 ),
cut( seq( from = 1, to = 9, by = 1), breaks = c( 0, 3, 6, 9 ), include.lowest = TRUE ),
seq( from = 0.1, to = 0.9, by = 0.1 ),
cut( seq( from = 0.1, to = 0.9, by = 0.1), breaks = c( 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 ), include.lowest = TRUE ),
seq( from = 0.01, to = 0.09, by = 0.01 ),
cut( seq( from = 0.01, to = 0.09, by = 0.01), breaks = c( 0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09 ), include.lowest = TRUE )
)
输出：
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
[1,] 1 1 0.1 1 0.01 1
[2,] 2 1 0.2 1 0.02 1
[3,] 3 1 0.3 2 0.03 1
[4,] 4 2 0.4 2 0.04 2
[5,] 5 2 0.5 2 0.05 2
[6,] 6 2 0.6 2 0.06 3
[7,] 7 3 0.7 3 0.07 3
[8,] 8 3 0.8 3 0.08 3
[9,] 9 3 0.9 3 0.09 3
@问题概述了[这里] [1]，谢谢@Joran。 @我发现这项工作围绕不等切割间隔的解决方案。 @我在R中使用了圆函数。通过将选项设置为2位，没有解决问题。
options(digits = 2)
cbind(
seq( from = 1, to = 9, by = 1 ),
cut( seq( from = 1, to = 9, by = 1), c( 0, 3, 6, 9 ) ),
seq( from = 0.1, to = 0.9, by = 0.1 ),
cut( seq( from = 0.1, to = 0.9, by = 0.1), c( 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 )),
seq( from = 0.01, to = 0.09, by = 0.01 ),
cut( seq( from = 0.01, to = 0.09, by = 0.01), c( 0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09 ))
)
基于选项（数字= 2）的不等切割间隔的输出：
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
[1,] 1 1 0.1 1 0.01 1
[2,] 2 1 0.2 1 0.02 1
[3,] 3 1 0.3 2 0.03 1
[4,] 4 2 0.4 2 0.04 2
[5,] 5 2 0.5 2 0.05 2
[6,] 6 2 0.6 2 0.06 3
[7,] 7 3 0.7 3 0.07 3
[8,] 8 3 0.8 3 0.08 3
[9,] 9 3 0.9 3 0.09 3
options(digits = 200)
cbind(
seq( from = 1, to = 9, by = 1 ),
cut( round(seq( from = 1, to = 9, by = 1), 2), c( 0, 3, 6, 9 ) ),
seq( from = 0.1, to = 0.9, by = 0.1 ),
cut( round(seq( from = 0.1, to = 0.9, by = 0.1), 2), c( 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 )),
seq( from = 0.01, to = 0.09, by = 0.01 ),
cut( round(seq( from = 0.01, to = 0.09, by = 0.01), 2), c( 0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09 ))
)
基于圆函数的等切割间隔输出：
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
[1,] 1 1 0.1 1 0.01 1
[2,] 2 1 0.2 1 0.02 1
[3,] 3 1 0.3 1 0.03 1
[4,] 4 2 0.4 2 0.04 2
[5,] 5 2 0.5 2 0.05 2
[6,] 6 2 0.6 2 0.06 2
[7,] 7 3 0.7 3 0.07 3
[8,] 8 3 0.8 3 0.08 3
[9,] 9 3 0.9 3 0.09 3