我试着用pyparsing来解析逻辑表达式,比如这些
x
FALSE
NOT x
(x + y <= 5) AND (y >= 10) OR NOT (z < 100 OR w)
(A=True OR NOT (G < 8) => S = J) => ((P = A) AND not (P = 1) AND (B = O)) => (S = T)
((P = T) AND NOT (K =J) AND (B = F)) => (S = O) AND
((P = T) OR (k and b => (8 + z <= 10)) AND NOT (a + 9 <= F)) => (7 = a + z)
我在下面写的代码似乎可以正常工作 -- 但速度非常慢(例如上面最后一个例子需要几秒钟)。 也许应该用递归代替operatorPrecedence?有什么方法可以加快它的速度?
identifier = Group(Word(alphas, alphanums + "_") + Optional("'"))
num = Regex(r"[+-]?\d+(:?\.\d*)?(:?[eE][+-]?\d+)?")
operator = Regex(">=|<=|!=|>|<|=")
operand = identifier | num
aexpr = operatorPrecedence(operand,
[('*',2,opAssoc.LEFT,),
('+',2,opAssoc.LEFT,),
(operator,2,opAssoc.LEFT,)
])
op_prec = [(CaselessLiteral('not'),1,opAssoc.RIGHT,),
(CaselessLiteral('and'),2,opAssoc.LEFT ,),
(CaselessLiteral('or'), 2,opAssoc.LEFT ,),
('=>', 2,opAssoc.LEFT ,),
]
sentence = operatorPrecedence(aexpr,op_prec)
return sentence
我也有同样的问题。在这里找到了一个解决方案(parserElement.enablePackrat()
): https:/github.compyparsingpyparsing。
下面的代码现在是即时解析的(与之前的60秒相比)
ParserElement.enablePackrat()
integer = Word(nums).setParseAction(lambda t:int(t[0]))('int')
operand = integer | variable('var')
# Left precedence
eq = Literal("==")('eq')
gt = Literal(">")('gt')
gtEq = Literal(">=")('gtEq')
lt = Literal("<")('lt')
ltEq = Literal("<=")('ltEq')
notEq = Literal("!=")('notEq')
mult = oneOf('* /')('mult')
plus = oneOf('+ -')('plus')
_and = oneOf('&& and')('and')
_or = oneOf('|| or')('or')
# Right precedence
sign = oneOf('+ -')('sign')
negation = Literal('!')('negation')
# Operator groups per presedence
right_op = negation | sign
# Highest precedence
left_op_1 = mult
left_op_2 = plus
left_op_3 = gtEq | ltEq | lt | gt
left_op_4 = eq | notEq
left_op_5 = _and
left_op_6 = _or
# Lowest precedence
condition = operatorPrecedence( operand, [
(right_op, 1, opAssoc.RIGHT),
(left_op_1, 2, opAssoc.LEFT),
(left_op_2, 2, opAssoc.LEFT),
(left_op_3, 2, opAssoc.LEFT),
(left_op_4, 2, opAssoc.LEFT),
(left_op_5, 2, opAssoc.LEFT),
(left_op_6, 2, opAssoc.LEFT)
]
)('computation')
我把你的代码放到一个小程序里
from sys import argv
from pyparsing import *
def parsit(aexpr):
identifier = Group(Word(alphas, alphanums + "_") + Optional("'"))
num = Regex(r"[+-]?\d+(:?\.\d*)?(:?[eE][+-]?\d+)?")
operator = Regex(">=|<=|!=|>|<|=")
operand = identifier | num
aexpr = operatorPrecedence(operand,
[('*',2,opAssoc.LEFT,),
('+',2,opAssoc.LEFT,),
(operator,2,opAssoc.LEFT,)
])
op_prec = [(CaselessLiteral('not'),1,opAssoc.RIGHT,),
(CaselessLiteral('and'),2,opAssoc.LEFT ,),
(CaselessLiteral('or'), 2,opAssoc.LEFT ,),
('=>', 2,opAssoc.LEFT ,),
]
sentence = operatorPrecedence(aexpr,op_prec)
return sentence
def demo02(arg):
sent = parsit(arg)
print arg, ":", sent.parseString(arg)
def demo01():
for arg in ["x", "FALSE", "NOT x",
"(x + y <= 5) AND (y >= 10) OR NOT (z < 100 OR w)",
"(A=True OR NOT (G < 8) => S = J) => ((P = A) AND not (P = 1) AND (B = O)) => (S = T)",
"((P = T) AND NOT (K =J) AND (B = F)) => (S = O) AND ((P = T) OR (k and b => (8 + z <= 10)) AND NOT (a + 9 <= F)) => (7 = a + z)"
]:
demo02(arg)
if len(argv) <= 1:
demo01()
else:
for arg in argv[1:]:
demo02(arg)
并贯穿 cProfile
$ python -m cProfile pyparsetest.py
你会发现 众多 parseImpl
调用,但是在输出的中间有一个
2906500/8 26.374 0.000 72.667 9.083 pyparsing.py:913(_parseNoCache)
212752/300 1.045 0.000 72.608 0.242 pyparsing.py:985(tryParse)
的 72.667
是指从 72
共。
因此我大胆猜测,"缓存 "将提供一个很好的杠杆。
只是启用http:/pyparsing-public.wikispaces.comFAQs并没有帮助,thoug。我添加了以下几行
import pyparsing
pyparsing.usePackrat = True
和运行时间是一样的。
Number-Regex在我看来也很好--很标准,我想。例如,将它替换为
#num = Regex(r"[+-]?\d+(:?\.\d*)?(:?[eE][+-]?\d+)?")
num = Regex(r"8|1|10|100|5")
也没有帮助。在我的简单变体中没有 "空匹配",我猜测这可能是一个问题,但似乎不是。
最后一次尝试是看结果解析器,然后......哇......好长啊!
....
sentence = operatorPrecedence(aexpr,op_prec)
print sentence
return sentence
....
And... Whow... 长!
嗯,还有 不 用你的第一个 operatorPrecedence
是 好多 更快,但对于算术来说,就不行了。
因此,我大胆猜测,是的,试着把两种表达式(布尔和算术)多分开。也许这样会有所改善。我也会研究一下,我也很感兴趣。