将“未分类的” variabel发送为函数参数?

问题描述 投票:1回答:3

如何创建我自己的'...'变量?

函数通常返回特定的结构(或类)。有时,函数的参数也是返回结构的一部分。处理完结果后,如何将其作为参数发送给一个函数(或再次发送给同一函数)?

非常简短的伪示例:

res1 <- power.t.test(alot of parameters)
res1b <- res1
res1b$some.parameter <- new-value
res2 <- power.t.test(parameters = unclass(res1b))

这是一个一般性的问题,我在尝试解决特定问题时偶然发现。我提供了代码,希望可以澄清我的问题:

set.seed(42); data <- rnorm(20) #to be able to reproduce

# Calculate how many pairs I need to find a difference of 1 ----
ptt1 <- power.t.test(delta = 1, sd = sd(data), sig.level = 0.05, power = 0.8, type = "paired", alternative = "two.sided")
# Paired t test power calculation
# 
# n = 15.55315
# delta = 1
# sd = 1.312628
# sig.level = 0.05
# power = 0.8
# alternative = two.sided
# 
# NOTE: n is number of *pairs*, sd is std.dev. of *differences* within pairs

# However, I wishing to know the exact power when changing n to next greater integer ----
ptt1$n <- ceiling(ptt1$n)
ptt1$power <- NULL
unclass(ptt1)
# $n
# [1] 16
# $delta
# [1] 1
# $sd
# [1] 1.312628
# $sig.level
# [1] 0.05
# $alternative
# [1] "two.sided"
# $note
# [1] "n is number of *pairs*, sd is std.dev. of *differences* within pairs"
# $method
# [1] "Paired t test power calculation"

# This is a solution ----
power.t.test.power <- function(ptt) {
  power.t.test(n = ceiling(ptt$n), delta = ptt$delta, sd = ptt$sd, sig.level = ptt$sig.level, type = ptt$type, alternative = ptt$alternative)
}

ptt1$type <- "paired" #power.t.test output (of class "power.htest") misses this named element
power.t.test.power(ptt1)
# Paired t test power calculation 
# 
# n = 16
# delta = 1
# sd = 1.312628
# sig.level = 0.05
# power = 0.8126338
# alternative = two.sided
# 
# NOTE: n is number of *pairs*, sd is std.dev. of *differences* within pairs

# BUT I WISHED that any of this would work, but all gives the same error ----
power.t.test(ptt1)
power.t.test(unclass(ptt1))
power.t.test(unlist(ptt1))
# Error in power.t.test(ptt1) : 
#   exactly one of 'n', 'delta', 'sd', 'power', and 'sig.level' must be NULL

r ellipsis function-call function-parameter
3个回答
0
投票

我看到您已经接受了另一个答案,但仅作记录:

do.call是调用函数并传递列表而不是单个参数的方法。在这种情况下,它将如下所示:

do.call(power.t.test,as.list(ptt1))

如果只想传递一些参数,则可以使用在该函数的参数列表中显示的名称对向量进行子集设置:

do.call(power.t.test,as.list(ptt1[names(ptt1) %in% formalArgs(power.t.test)]))

0
投票

[这是一个解决方案,可能不是最佳选择,将结果指定为所有参数和结果的列表,并使用第一个参数的unlist处理丢失的参数:

af <- function(v1, v2 = NULL, v3 = NULL, v4 = NULL, res = NULL){

    if(is.null(v2)){
        cat("v2 null")
        v1 <- unlist(v1)
        v2 <- v1[2] ; v3 <- v1[3] ; res <- v1[5] ;

        v4 <- ifelse(is.null(res), v4, res)
        v1 <- v1[1]
    }
    return(list(v1 = v1, 
            v2 = v2, 
            v3 = v3, 
            v4 = v4, res = v1 + v2 + v3 + v4 ) )
}

r1 <- af(1, 1, 1, 1)
r1
af(r1)

0
投票

您可以使用purrr::lift将功能从接受参数作为...更改为接受列表:

## power.t.test2 accepts arguments as a single list
power.t.test2 <- purrr::lift( power.t.test )

## Modify outputs as needed
ptt1$n <- ceiling(ptt1$n)
ptt1$power <- NULL

## Reduce to a set of arguments that are accepted by the function
a <- intersect(names(ptt1), formalArgs(power.t.test))

## Use the version that accepts the list
power.t.test2( ptt1[a] )
© www.soinside.com 2019 - 2024. All rights reserved.