我们有一个从ControllerBase
派生的控制器,它具有这样的动作:
public async Task<ActionResult> Get(int id)
{
try
{
// Logic
return Ok(someReturnValue);
}
catch
{
return Problem();
}
}
我们也有这样的单元测试:
[TestMethod]
public async Task GetCallsProblemOnInvalidId()
{
var result = sut.Get(someInvalidId);
}
但是ControllerBase.Problem()
会引发Null引用异常。这是Core MVC框架中的一种方法,因此我真的不知道为什么它会引发错误。我认为可能是因为HttpContext为空,但是我不确定。是否存在标准化方法来测试控制器应调用Problem()
的测试用例?任何帮助表示赞赏。如果答案涉及嘲笑:我们使用Moq和AutoFixtrue。
空异常是由于缺少ProblemDetailsFactory
在这种情况下,控制器需要能够通过以下方式创建ProblemDetails
实例:>
[NonAction]
public virtual ObjectResult Problem(
string detail = null,
string instance = null,
int? statusCode = null,
string title = null,
string type = null)
{
var problemDetails = ProblemDetailsFactory.CreateProblemDetails(
HttpContext,
statusCode: statusCode ?? 500,
title: title,
type: type,
detail: detail,
instance: instance);
return new ObjectResult(problemDetails)
{
StatusCode = problemDetails.Status
};
}
ProblemDetailsFactory
是可设置的属性
public ProblemDetailsFactory ProblemDetailsFactory
{
get
{
if (_problemDetailsFactory == null)
{
_problemDetailsFactory = HttpContext?.RequestServices?.GetRequiredService<ProblemDetailsFactory>();
}
return _problemDetailsFactory;
}
set
{
if (value == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(value));
}
_problemDetailsFactory = value;
}
}
在单独测试时可能会被模拟和填充。
[TestMethod]
public async Task GetCallsProblemOnInvalidId() {
//Arrange
var problemDetails = new ProblemDetails() {
//...populate as needed
};
var mock = new Mock<ProblemDetailsFactory>();
mock
.Setup(_ => _.CreateProblemDetails(
It.IsAny<HttpContext>(),
It.IsAny<int?>(),
It.IsAny<string>(),
It.IsAny<string>(),
It.IsAny<string>(),
It.IsAny<string>())
)
.Returns(problemDetails)
.Verifyable();
var sut = new MyController(...);
sut.ProblemDetailsFactory = mock.Object;
//...
//Act
var result = await sut.Get(someInvalidId);
//Assert
mock.Verify();//verify setup(s) invoked as expected
//...other assertions
}