我在NodeJS应用上有一个“服务器发送事件”路由,客户端可以订阅该路由,客户端可以从服务器获取实时更新。看起来如下:
router.get('/updates', (req, res) => {
res.writeHead(200, {
'Content-Type': 'text/event-stream',
'Cache-Control': 'no-cache',
'Connection': 'keep-alive'
})
const triggered = (info) => {
res.write(`\ndata: ${JSON.stringify(info)}\n\n`)
}
eventEmitter.addListener(constants.events.TRIGGERED, triggered)
req.on('close', () => {
eventEmitter.removeListener(constants.events.TRIGGERED, triggered)
})
})
在节点中使用supertest
测试传统路由非常简单:
test('Should get and render view', async() => {
const res = await request(app)
.get('/')
.expect(200)
expect(res.text).not.toBeUndefined()
})
但是,这在测试SSE路由时不起作用。
有人对如何使用Node测试SSE路由有任何想法吗?不一定必须使用supertest
进行测试。只是想寻找有关如何测试的想法,supertest
或其他。
编辑:我对如何进行集成测试有一个想法。基本上,必须在测试之前启动服务器,在测试期间订阅它,然后在测试之后关闭它。但是,当我使用beforeEach()和afterEach()启动服务器时,它无法达到Jest的预期效果。
我会模拟/伪造终结点使用的所有内容,并检查终结点是否使用正确的变量以正确的顺序执行。首先,我将在端点外部声明trigger
函数和close
事件回调,以便可以直接对其进行测试。其次,我将消除所有函数中的所有全局引用,而推荐使用函数参数:
let triggered = (res) => (info) => {
res.write(`\ndata: ${JSON.stringify(info)}\n\n`);
}
let onCloseHandler = (eventEmitter, constants, triggered, res) => () => {
eventEmitter.removeListener(constants.events.TRIGGERED, triggered(res));
}
let updatesHandler = (eventEmitter, constants, triggered) => (req, res) => {
res.writeHead(200, {
'Content-Type': 'text/event-stream',
'Cache-Control': 'no-cache',
'Connection': 'keep-alive'
});
eventEmitter.addListener(constants.events.TRIGGERED, triggered(res));
req.on('close', onCloseHandler(eventEmitter, constants, triggered, res));
};
router.get('/updates', updatesHandler(eventEmitter, constants, triggered));
使用此代码,测试用例将像:
test("triggered", () => {
let res;
beforeEach(() => {
res = generateFakeRespone();
});
it("should execute res.write with the correct variable", () => {
trigger(res)("whatever");
expect(res.write).to.have.been.called.once;
expect(res.write).to.have.been.called.with(`\ndata: ${JSON.stringify("whatever")}\n\n`);
});
});
test("onCloseHandler", () => {
let res;
let eventEmitter;
let constants;
let triggered;
beforeEach(() => {
res = Math.random();
eventEmitter = generateFakeEventEmitter();
constants = generateFakeConstants();
triggered = generateFakeTriggered();
});
it("should execute eventEmitter.removeListener", () => {
onCloseHandler(eventEmitter, constants, triggered, res);
expect(eventEmitter.removeListener).to.have.been.called.once;
expect(eventEmitter.removeListener).to.have.been.called.with(/*...*/)
});
});
test("updatesHandler", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
req = generateFakeRequest();
res = generateFakeRespone();
eventEmitter = generateFakeEventEmitter();
constants = generateFakeConstants();
triggered = generateFakeTriggered();
});
it("should execute res.writeHead", () => {
updatesHandler(eventEmitter, constants, triggered)(req, res);
expect(res.writeHead).to.have.been.called.once;
expect(res.writeHead).to.have.been.called.with(/*...*/)
});
it("should execute req.on", () => {
//...
});
// more tests ...
});
通过这种编码和测试风格,您可以进行非常详细的单元测试。缺点是要花费更多的精力来正确测试所有内容。