是否应该使用类继承来破坏类的可解码性。例如,以下代码
class Server : Codable {
var id : Int?
}
class Development : Server {
var name : String?
var userId : Int?
}
var json = "{\"id\" : 1,\"name\" : \"Large Building Development\"}"
let jsonDecoder = JSONDecoder()
let item = try jsonDecoder.decode(Development.self, from:json.data(using: .utf8)!) as Development
print(item.id ?? "id is nil")
print(item.name ?? "name is nil") here
输出是:
1
name is nil
现在,如果我反转这个,名称解码但id没有。
class Server {
var id : Int?
}
class Development : Server, Codable {
var name : String?
var userId : Int?
}
var json = "{\"id\" : 1,\"name\" : \"Large Building Development\"}"
let jsonDecoder = JSONDecoder()
let item = try jsonDecoder.decode(Development.self, from:json.data(using: .utf8)!) as Development
print(item.id ?? "id is nil")
print(item.name ?? "name is nil")
输出是:
id is nil
Large Building Development
并且你不能在两个班级中表达Codable。
我相信继承的情况你必须自己实现Coding
。也就是说,您必须指定CodingKeys
并在超类和子类中实现init(from:)
和encode(to:)
。根据WWDC video(大约49:28,如下图所示),您必须使用超级编码器/解码器调用super。
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
// Get our container for this subclass' coding keys
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
myVar = try container.decode(MyType.self, forKey: .myVar)
// otherVar = ...
// Get superDecoder for superclass and call super.init(from:) with it
let superDecoder = try container.superDecoder()
try super.init(from: superDecoder)
}
该视频似乎没有显示编码方面(但它是container.superEncoder()
方面的encode(to:)
)但它在encode(to:)
实现中的工作原理大致相同。我可以在这个简单的例子中确认这是有效的(参见下面的游乐场代码)。
我仍在努力解决一些奇怪的行为,我正在使用一个更加复杂的模型,我正在从NSCoding
转换,它有许多新嵌套类型(包括struct
和enum
),这些类型表现出这种意想不到的nil
行为并且“不应该” 。请注意,可能存在涉及嵌套类型的边缘情况。
编辑:嵌套类型似乎在我的测试操场中正常工作;我现在怀疑自引用类(想想树节点的子节点)有一个错误,它有一个自身的集合,它也包含该类的各个子类的实例。对一个简单的自引用类的测试解码很好(也就是说,没有子类)所以我现在正集中精力研究子类案例失败的原因。
更新于2017年6月25日:我最终向Apple提交了一个关于此问题的错误。 rdar:// 32911973 - 不幸的是,包含Superclass
元素的Subclass: Superclass
数组的编码/解码周期将导致数组中的所有元素被解码为Superclass
(从不调用子类'init(from:)
,导致数据丢失或更糟)。
//: Fully-Implemented Inheritance
class FullSuper: Codable {
var id: UUID?
init() {}
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey { case id }
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
id = try container.decode(UUID.self, forKey: .id)
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
try container.encode(id, forKey: .id)
}
}
class FullSub: FullSuper {
var string: String?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey { case string }
override init() { super.init() }
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
let superdecoder = try container.superDecoder()
try super.init(from: superdecoder)
string = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .string)
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
try container.encode(string, forKey: .string)
let superencoder = container.superEncoder()
try super.encode(to: superencoder)
}
}
let fullSub = FullSub()
fullSub.id = UUID()
fullSub.string = "FullSub"
let fullEncoder = PropertyListEncoder()
let fullData = try fullEncoder.encode(fullSub)
let fullDecoder = PropertyListDecoder()
let fullSubDecoded: FullSub = try fullDecoder.decode(FullSub.self, from: fullData)
超级和子类属性都在fullSubDecoded
中恢复。
Found This Link - Go down to inheritance section
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
try super.encode(to: encoder)
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
try container.encode(employeeID, forKey: .employeeID)
}
对于解码,我这样做了:
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
try super.init(from: decoder)
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
total = try values.decode(Int.self, forKey: .total)
}
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey
{
case total
}
通过使我的基类和子类符合Decodable
而不是Codable
,我能够使它工作。如果我使用Codable
它会以奇怪的方式崩溃,例如在访问子类的字段时获取EXC_BAD_ACCESS
,但调试器可以显示所有子类值没有问题。
另外,将superDecoder传递给super.init()
中的基类不起作用。我只是将解码器从子类传递给基类。
使用以下方式怎么样?
protocol Parent: Codable {
var inheritedProp: Int? {get set}
}
struct Child: Parent {
var inheritedProp: Int?
var title: String?
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case inheritedProp = "inherited_prop"
case title = "short_title"
}
}
关于组成的其他信息:http://mikebuss.com/2016/01/10/interfaces-vs-inheritance/
这是一个库TypePreservingCodingAdapter就是这样做的(可以用Cocoapods或SwiftPackageManager安装)。
下面的代码编译并与Swift 4.2
一起使用。不幸的是,对于每个子类,您需要自己实现属性的编码和解码。
import TypePreservingCodingAdapter
import Foundation
// redeclared your types with initializers
class Server: Codable {
var id: Int?
init(id: Int?) {
self.id = id
}
}
class Development: Server {
var name: String?
var userId: Int?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case name
case userId
}
init(id: Int?, name: String?, userId: Int?) {
self.name = name
self.userId = userId
super.init(id: id)
}
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
try super.init(from: decoder)
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
name = try container.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: .name)
userId = try container.decodeIfPresent(Int.self, forKey: .userId)
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
try super.encode(to: encoder)
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
try container.encode(name, forKey: .name)
try container.encode(userId, forKey: .userId)
}
}
// create and adapter
let adapter = TypePreservingCodingAdapter()
let encoder = JSONEncoder()
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
// inject it into encoder and decoder
encoder.userInfo[.typePreservingAdapter] = adapter
decoder.userInfo[.typePreservingAdapter] = adapter
// register your types with adapter
adapter.register(type: Server.self).register(type: Development.self)
let server = Server(id: 1)
let development = Development(id: 2, name: "dev", userId: 42)
let servers: [Server] = [server, development]
// wrap specific object with Wrap helper object
let data = try! encoder.encode(servers.map { Wrap(wrapped: $0) })
// decode object back and unwrap them force casting to a common ancestor type
let decodedServers = try! decoder.decode([Wrap].self, from: data).map { $0.wrapped as! Server }
// check that decoded object are of correct types
print(decodedServers.first is Server) // prints true
print(decodedServers.last is Development) // prints true