可遍历[]的使用效果,可能在镜头库中的应用

问题描述 投票:5回答:2

我具有以下结构:

y = [
  fromList([("c", 1 ::Int)]),
  fromList([("c", 5)]),
  fromList([("d", 20)])
  ]

我可以用它来更新每个“ c”:

y & mapped . at "c" . mapped  %~ (+ 1)
-- [fromList [("c",2)], fromList [("c",6)], fromList [("d",20)]]

因此,基本上仅忽略第三项。但我要的是使操作失败。

仅更新,如果所有映射都包含键“ c”。

所以我想要:

y & mysteryOp
-- [fromList [("c",1)], fromList [("c",5)], fromList [("d",20)]]
-- fail because third entry does not contain "c" as key

我想我知道在这里使用哪些功能:

over
-- I want to map the content of the list

mapped
-- map over the structure and transform to [(Maybe Int)]

traverse
-- I need to apply the operation, which will avoid 

at "c"
-- I need to index into the key "c"

我只是不知道如何组合它们

haskell data-manipulation lens
2个回答
1
投票

我看不出有一种简单的镜头组合器来编写它的方法,但这是您可以从头开始编写的遍历。如果每个映射都包含"c"键的所有值,则它应遍历所有键,否则应不遍历任何值。

我们可以从一个辅助函数开始,以“也许”用新的键值更新地图,如果键不存在,则失败Maybe monad。出于显而易见的原因,我们希望允许在任意函子中进行更新。也就是说,我们需要一个函数:

maybeUpdate :: (Functor f, Ord k) => k -> (v -> f v) -> Map k v -> Maybe (f (Map k v))

该签名清楚吗?我们检查密钥kIf找到键,我们将返回Just一个更新的映射,并在v函子中更新键的对应值f否则,如果找不到密钥,则返回Nothing。尽管我们只想使用ApplicativeDo约束,但我们需要Functor f扩展名,但我们可以用monad表示法清楚地写出这一点:

maybeUpdate :: (Functor f, Ord k) => k -> (v -> f v) -> Map k v -> Maybe (f (Map k v))
maybeUpdate k f m = do            -- in Maybe monad
  v <- m ^. at k
  return $ do                     -- in "f" functor
    a <- f v
    return $ m & at k .~ Just a

或者,这些“单子动作”实际上只是函子动作,因此可以使用此定义:

maybeUpdate' k f m =
  m ^. at k <&> \v -> f v <&> \a -> m & at k .~ Just a

这是最困难的部分。现在,遍历非常简单。我们从签名开始:

traverseAll :: (Ord k) => k -> Traversal' [Map k v] v
traverseAll k f maps =

[这个想法是通过使用Maybe助手在maybeUpdate应用程序上遍历地图列表开始的:

traverse (maybeUpdate k f) maps :: Maybe [f (Map k v)]

如果此遍历成功(返回Just一个列表),则找到所有键,然后我们可以对f应用动作进行排序:

sequenceA <$> traverse (maybeUpdate k f) maps :: Maybe (f [Map k v])

现在,如果遍历失败,我们仅使用maybe返回原始列表:

traverseAll k f maps = maybe (pure maps) id (sequenceA <$> traverse (maybeUpdate k f) maps)

现在,带有:

y :: [Map String Int]
y = [
  fromList([("c", 1 ::Int)]),
  fromList([("c", 5)]),
  fromList([("d", 20)])
  ]
y2 :: [Map String Int]
y2 = [
  fromList([("c", 1 ::Int)]),
  fromList([("c", 5)]),
  fromList([("d", 20),("c",6)])
  ]

我们有:

> y & traverseAll "c" %~ (1000*)
[fromList [("c",1)],fromList [("c",5)],fromList [("d",20)]]
> y2 & traverseAll "c" %~ (1000*)
[fromList [("c",1000)],fromList [("c",5000)],fromList [("c",6000),("d",20)]]

完全公开:我无法从头开始构建这样的traverseAll。我从隐式身份应用中的愚蠢的“遍历”开始:

traverseAllC' :: (Int -> Int) -> [Map String Int] -> [Map String Int]
traverseAllC' f xall = maybe xall id (go xall)
  where go :: [Map String Int] -> Maybe [Map String Int]
        go (x:xs) = case x !? "c" of
          Just a -> (Map.insert "c" (f a) x:) <$> go xs
          Nothing -> Nothing
        go [] = Just []

并且一旦我启动并运行它,我就简化了它,使Identity变得明确:

traverseAllC_ :: (Int -> Identity Int) -> [Map String Int] -> Identity [Map String Int]

并将其转换为通用应用程序。

无论如何,这是代码:

{-# LANGUAGE ApplicativeDo #-}
{-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}

import Data.Map (Map, fromList)
import Control.Lens

y :: [Map [Char] Int]
y = [
  fromList([("c", 1 ::Int)]),
  fromList([("c", 5)]),
  fromList([("d", 20)])
  ]
y2 :: [Map [Char] Int]
y2 = [
  fromList([("c", 1 ::Int)]),
  fromList([("c", 5)]),
  fromList([("d", 20),("c",6)])
  ]

traverseAll :: (Ord k) => k -> Traversal' [Map k v] v
traverseAll k f maps = maybe (pure maps) id (sequenceA <$> traverse (maybeUpdate k f) maps)

maybeUpdate :: (Functor f, Ord k) => k -> (v -> f v) -> Map k v -> Maybe (f (Map k v))
maybeUpdate k f m = do
  v <- m ^. at k
  return $ do
    a <- f v
    return $ m & at k .~ Just a

maybeUpdate' :: (Functor f, Ord k) => k -> (v -> f v) -> Map k v -> Maybe (f (Map k v))
maybeUpdate' k f m =
  m ^. at k <&> \v -> f v <&> \a -> m & at k .~ Just a

main = do
  print $ y & traverseAll "c" %~ (1000*)
  print $ y2 & traverseAll "c" %~ (1000*)

0
投票

[这里有两种替代方法,可以像您喜欢的镜头一样观看;


0
投票

一种单线,尽管大多数情况下是非宽松的,但使用(<%~),即setting with passthrough operators之一:

© www.soinside.com 2019 - 2024. All rights reserved.