我想写这个结构:
struct A {
b: B,
c: C,
}
struct B {
c: &C,
}
struct C;
B.c
应该是从A.c
借来的。
A ->
b: B ->
c: &C -- borrow from --+
|
c: C <------------------+
这是我尝试过的:
struct C;
struct B<'b> {
c: &'b C,
}
struct A<'a> {
b: B<'a>,
c: C,
}
impl<'a> A<'a> {
fn new<'b>() -> A<'b> {
let c = C;
A {
c: c,
b: B { c: &c },
}
}
}
fn main() {}
但是失败了:
error[E0597]: `c` does not live long enough
--> src/main.rs:17:24
|
17 | b: B { c: &c },
| ^ borrowed value does not live long enough
18 | }
19 | }
| - borrowed value only lives until here
|
note: borrowed value must be valid for the lifetime 'b as defined on the method body at 13:5...
--> src/main.rs:13:5
|
13 | fn new<'b>() -> A<'b> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `c`
--> src/main.rs:17:24
|
16 | c: c,
| - value moved here
17 | b: B { c: &c },
| ^ value used here after move
|
= note: move occurs because `c` has type `C`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
我已经阅读了有关所有权的 Rust 文档,但我仍然不知道如何修复它。
实际上上面的代码失败的原因不止一个。让我们稍微分解一下并探索一些如何修复它的选项。
首先让我们删除
new
并尝试直接在 A
中构建 main
的实例,这样你就会发现问题的第一部分与生命周期无关:
struct C;
struct B<'b> {
c: &'b C,
}
struct A<'a> {
b: B<'a>,
c: C,
}
fn main() {
// I copied your new directly here
// and renamed c1 so we know what "c"
// the errors refer to
let c1 = C;
let _ = A {
c: c1,
b: B { c: &c1 },
};
}
这失败了:
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `c1`
--> src/main.rs:20:20
|
19 | c: c1,
| -- value moved here
20 | b: B { c: &c1 },
| ^^ value used here after move
|
= note: move occurs because `c1` has type `C`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
它的意思是,如果将
c1
分配给 c
,则将其所有权移至 c
(即,您无法再通过 c1
访问它,只能通过 c
访问它)。这意味着所有对 c1
的引用将不再有效。但是你的 &c1
仍然在范围内(在 B 中),所以编译器不能让你编译这段代码。
当编译器指出类型
C
不可复制时,它会在错误消息中提示可能的解决方案。如果您可以复制 C
,那么您的代码将是有效的,因为将 c1
分配给 c
将创建该值的新副本,而不是移动原始副本的所有权。
我们可以通过更改其定义来使
C
可复制,如下所示:
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
struct C;
现在上面的代码可以运行了。请注意,@matthieu-m 评论仍然是正确的:我们无法在 B 中同时存储对值的引用和值本身(我们在此处存储对值的引用和值的副本) )。但这不仅仅适用于结构,这也是所有权的运作方式。
现在,如果您不想(或不能)使C
可复制,您可以将引用存储在
A
和
B
中。
struct C;
struct B<'b> {
c: &'b C,
}
struct A<'a> {
b: B<'a>,
c: &'a C, // now this is a reference too
}
fn main() {
let c1 = C;
let _ = A {
c: &c1,
b: B { c: &c1 },
};
}
那么一切都好吗?并非如此......我们仍然希望将
A
的创建移回到
new
方法中。这就是我们会遇到一生麻烦的地方。让我们将
A
的创建移回到方法中:
impl<'a> A<'a> {
fn new() -> A<'a> {
let c1 = C;
A {
c: &c1,
b: B { c: &c1 },
}
}
}
正如预期的那样,这是我们一生的错误:
error[E0597]: `c1` does not live long enough
--> src/main.rs:17:17
|
17 | c: &c1,
| ^^ borrowed value does not live long enough
...
20 | }
| - borrowed value only lives until here
|
note: borrowed value must be valid for the lifetime 'a as defined on the impl at 13:1...
--> src/main.rs:13:1
|
13 | impl<'a> A<'a> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0597]: `c1` does not live long enough
--> src/main.rs:18:24
|
18 | b: B { c: &c1 },
| ^^ borrowed value does not live long enough
19 | }
20 | }
| - borrowed value only lives until here
|
note: borrowed value must be valid for the lifetime 'a as defined on the impl at 13:1...
--> src/main.rs:13:1
|
13 | impl<'a> A<'a> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
这是因为
c1
在
new
方法结束时被销毁,所以我们无法返回对它的引用。
fn new() -> A<'a> {
let c1 = C; // we create c1 here
A {
c: &c1, // ...take a reference to it
b: B { c: &c1 }, // ...and another
}
} // and destroy c1 here (so we can't return A with a reference to c1)
一种可能的解决方案是在
C
之外创建
new
并将其作为参数传入:
struct C;
struct B<'b> {
c: &'b C,
}
struct A<'a> {
b: B<'a>,
c: &'a C
}
fn main() {
let c1 = C;
let _ = A::new(&c1);
}
impl<'a> A<'a> {
fn new(c: &'a C) -> A<'a> {
A {c: c, b: B{c: c}}
}
}
impl<'a> A<'a> {
fn new() -> A<'a> {
let c1:&'a C = &C;
A {
c: c1,
b: B { c: c1 },
}
}
}