我正在尝试使用RxJS缓存来避免不必要地重复某些HTTP调用。在尝试publishReplay
时,我得到了以下代码段(受this blog post启发):
let counter = 1;
const updateRequest = Observable.defer(() => mockDataFetch())
.publishReplay(1, 1000)
.refCount();
function mockDataFetch() {
return Observable.of(counter++)
.delay(0); // <-- delay by 0 milliseconds
}
function mockHttpCache() {
return updateRequest
.take(1);
}
setTimeout(() => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 50:", val)), 50);
setTimeout(() => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 500:", val)), 500);
setTimeout(() => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 1500:", val)), 1500);
这将按预期工作并产生输出:
'Response 50:', 1 'Response 500:', 1 'Response 1500:', 2
但是,当从内部可观察对象中删除.delay(0)
时,使其立即生效,在缓存持续时间过去之后,包装器不再产生任何结果。输出为:
'Response 50:', 1 'Response 500:', 1
即使再也没有缓存的项目,似乎也没有调用mockDataFetch
来收集新数据。这是否是预期的行为,如果是的话,其背后的原理是什么?
这是将您的代码翻译为RxJs 6.5.5
,以及其他一些小的修改:
let counter = 1;
const updateRequest = defer(() => mockDataFetch())
.pipe(
publishReplay(1, 1000),
refCount()
);
function mockDataFetch() {
console.log('RESUBSCRIBING');
return of(counter++)
.pipe(
// delay(0), // <-- delay by 0 milliseconds
);
}
function mockHttpCache() {
return updateRequest
.pipe(
take(1),
);
}
setTimeout(
() => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 50:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[1]')
), 50);
setTimeout(
() => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 500:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[2]')
), 500);
setTimeout(
() => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 1500:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[3]')
), 1500);
delay(0)
首先让我们看看publishReplay
is implemented:
publishReplay
如我们所见,由于const selector = typeof selectorOrScheduler === 'function' ? selectorOrScheduler : undefined;
const subject = new ReplaySubject<T>(bufferSize, windowTime, scheduler);
return (source: Observable<T>) => multicast(() => subject, selector!)(source) as ConnectableObservable<R>;
,它返回一个ConnectableObservable
:
multicast
这是multicast
的样子:
const connectable: any = Object.create(source, connectableObservableDescriptor);
connectable.source = source;
connectable.subjectFactory = subjectFactory;
return <ConnectableObservable<R>> connectable;
现在,让我们仔细看看refCount
,尤其是refCount
方法:
// `connectable` - the `ConnectableObservable` from above
constructor(private connectable: ConnectableObservable<T>) { }
// `call` - called when the source is subscribed
// `source` - the `ConnectableObservable` from above
call(subscriber: Subscriber<T>, source: any): TeardownLogic {
const { connectable } = this;
(<any> connectable)._refCount++;
const refCounter = new RefCountSubscriber(subscriber, connectable);
const subscription = source.subscribe(refCounter);
if (!refCounter.closed) {
(<any> refCounter).connection = connectable.connect();
}
return subscription;
}
ConnectableObservable
返回ConnectableObservable
实例的位置。 subscribe
上基本上发生的是将// Invoked as a result of `const subscription = source.subscribe(refCounter);` from `refCount`
_subscribe(subscriber: Subscriber<T>) {
return this.getSubject().subscribe(subscriber);
}
protected getSubject(): Subject<T> {
const subject = this._subject;
if (!subject || subject.isStopped) {
this._subject = this.subjectFactory();
}
return this._subject!;
}
添加到subjectFactory
的活动订户列表中。 ReplaySubject
会跟踪订阅者的数量,当不再有订阅者时,它将在注册新订阅者(使用相同的const subscription = source.subscribe(refCounter);
)实例时自动订阅源。
下一步,将调用RefCounterSubscriber
。
ReplaySubject
执行以下操作:
RefCounterSubscriber
到达这些行时:
ReplaySubject
该来源(例如(<any> refCounter).connection = connectable.connect();
)实际上将被订阅。
现在,connectable.connect()
是这样实现的(大致):
connectable.connect()
这意味着将首先到达 connect(): Subscription {
let connection = this._connection;
if (!connection) {
this._isComplete = false;
connection = this._connection = new Subscription();
connection.add(this.source
.subscribe(new ConnectableSubscriber(this.getSubject(), this)));
if (connection.closed) {
this._connection = null;
connection = Subscription.EMPTY;
}
}
return connection;
}
,当它发生时,它将发出该值,然后将发送connection.add(this.source
.subscribe(new ConnectableSubscriber(this.getSubject(), this)));
通知(最终通过调用mockDataFetch()
:]]]
情况下,如果of(counter)
因此,除了在链中进一步发送
// In this case, `arr = [counter]` new Observable(subscriber => { for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { subscriber.next(arr[i]); } subscriber.complete(); });
通知之外,它还将取消订阅。它最终将达到take(1)
的取消订阅逻辑,但将无法正常运行,因为一切都在[同步地]进行。在正常
complete
没有任何订阅者,则该来源将被取消订阅。 但是由于没有订阅者同时订阅源],所以会有稍微不同的行为。 Subscriber._complete()
的订户列表将为空,但源不会被取消订阅
,因为如上所述,它仍在订阅过程中。[最后的意思是将调用Subscriber._complete()
,这又将导致protected _complete(): void {
this.destination.complete();
this.unsubscribe();
}
收到complete
通知。但是请记住,当源将被重新订阅时,将使用相同的RefCounterSubscriber
。下一次再次订阅源时,将到达ReplaySubject
:
ReplaySubject
subscriber.complete();
。
这是程序的流程,没有ReplaySubject
complete
这将被记录:
ReplaySubject
带有these lines。
这取决于上一节中提到的一些细节。
const refCounter = new RefCountSubscriber(subscriber, connectable); // Subscribing to a **completed** Subject // If the Subject is completed, an EMPTY subscription will be reached const subscription = source.subscribe(refCounter); if (!refCounter.closed) { // Since `closed === true`, this block won't be reached (<any> refCounter).connection = connectable.connect(); } // Returning the EMPTY subscription return subscription;
将在每个EMPTY
implementation通知中安排EMPTY
中的操作(默认情况下)。该动作的任务是在delay(0)
通过之后发出接收到的值。它与使用setTimeout( // Source emits and the value is cached by the subject for 1 second // `take(1)` is reached // Send the value, then a `complete` notif. // But since sending a `complete` notif involves unsubscribing as well // The current subscriber will be removed from the `ReplaySubject`'s subscribers list // Then, the `ReplaySubject` will receive the `complete` notification and the subject becomes **completed** () => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 50:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[1]') ), 50); setTimeout( // Subscribing to a **completed** subject, but because it's a `ReplaySubject` // We'd still be getting the cached values, along with a `complete` notification () => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 500:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[2]') ), 500); setTimeout( // Since `1`'s time expired at 1 second, the `ReplaySubject` will only send a complete notification () => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 1500:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[3]') ), 1500);
基本相同,这意味着它不会同步
但是,当使用
RESUBSCRIBING Response 50: 1 complete[1] Response 500: 1 complete[2] complete[3]
时,将同步发送delay(0)
通知。delay(0)
:
AsyncScheduler
nexted
通知最终将在队列为空时发送。但是请记住,这全部是
asynchronous,这意味着。这是程序的流程,带0 ms
的行为将是normally
setTimeout
:of()
输出:
complete
This is how
delay
deals with it为了查看delay
是closed,您可以在SB项目中打开开发工具,按protected _complete() { // `this.queue` is populated when a `nexted` value arrives if (this.queue.length === 0) { this.destination.complete(); } // Unsubscribe from the previous items from the chain // What's further will **not** be affected this.unsubscribe(); }
,键入complete
并在其上放置logpoint
第78行(例如:RefCountSubscriber
):delay(0)
并且如果您注释掉最后一个setTimeout( // Subscribing to the source, which emits a value and a complete notif, synchronously // `delay` schedules an action that will do its job in 0ms(still asynchronously) // The value is emitted by the `delay`'s scheduled action // `take(1)` is reached // The value will be passed along then a `complete` notif will be sent // Then, the source will be unsubscribed // Due to `refCount`, the complete notif that came from the source // Won't reach the `ReplaySubject`. as it will already be unsubscribed from the source () => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 50:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[1]') ), 50); setTimeout( // Since only `500ms` have passed, this subscriber will receive the cached value (`1`) // and a `complete` notification, due to `take(1)` // But since `take(1)` operates synchronously, the `RefCountSubscriber` would be closed already, so the source won't be re-subscribed (//1) () => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 500:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[2]') ), 500); setTimeout( // `1500ms` passed, since `1000ms` the cache is empty // So the `take(1)` operator will receive nothing, meaning that the source // will be re-subscribed () => mockHttpCache().subscribe(val => console.log("Response 1500:", val), null, () => console.warn('complete[3]') ), 1500);
,您应该会看到类似这样的内容:
RESUBSCRIBING
Response 50:
1
complete[1]
Response 500:
1
complete[2]
RESUBSCRIBING
Response 1500:
2
complete[3]