curve_fit,python和excel之间的幂律回归问题

问题描述 投票:1回答:2

[抱歉,我是python和堆栈流的新手。所以我不能发布图片。

我想用python中的curve_fit函数进行幂定律回归。但是结果对我来说很奇怪。我使用excel进一步检查。两者之间看起来差别很大。黑线是来自curve_fit的结果,红线是来自excel的结果。有人能让我知道其中的区别吗?谢谢!

x=[164000,400,13000,700,57000,108,12000]
y=[0.011970,0.000098,0.066100,0.004300,0.042600,0.000061,0.002858 ]

def f(x,a,b):
    return a*x**b

popt,pocv=curve_fit(f,x,y)

ax.set_xscale("log")
ax.set_yscale("log")
ax.set_ylim(0.00001,0.1)
ax.set_xlim(10,1000000)

ax.scatter(x,y)

px=np.linspace(10,1000000,1000)

#parameter form curve_fit
py=a*px**b
[enter image description here][1]
#parameter from excel
pyy=3E-6*px**0.8305

ax.loglog(px,pyy,color="red")
ax.loglog(px,py,color="k")
python excel curve-fitting
2个回答
0
投票

least_squares进行对数拟合是有问题的,因为点和拟合线之间的差异随着x值的增大而增加。这就是为什么不合身的原因。要更正此问题,您可以在如下参数上添加界限:

popt,pcov=curve_fit(f,x,y, bounds=(0, [3*10**(-6), 0.9]))

您可以从pcov中获得摘要参数错误。

error = np.sum(np.sqrt(np.diag(pcov)))

输出:

enter image description here

或更改拟合方法。


0
投票

您正在对数日志空间中绘制数据的事实应该为适合于日志空间提供一个很好的提示。即,将np.log(a*x**b)设置为np.log(y)。可以实际运行并很合适的脚本修改如下:

import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
import  matplotlib.pyplot as plt

x=[164000,400,13000,700,57000,108,12000]
y=[0.011970,0.000098,0.066100,0.004300,0.042600,0.000061,0.002858 ]

def f(x, a, b):
    return np.log(a*x**b)

popt,pcov=curve_fit(f, x, np.log(y), [1.e-6, 0.9])

ax = plt.gca()

ax.set_xscale("log")
ax.set_yscale("log")
ax.set_ylim(0.00001,0.1)
ax.set_xlim(10,1000000)

ax.scatter(x,y)

px = np.linspace(10,1000000,1000)
a, b = popt
print("Parameters: a=%g,  b=%g" % (a, b))

#parameter form curve_fit
py=a*px**b

#parameter from excel
pyy=3e-6*px**0.8305

ax.loglog(px,pyy, color="red")
ax.loglog(px,py,  color="k")
plt.show()

始终确保提供参数的初始值,并确保打印出结果。举例来说,运行此命令将打印出Parameters: a=2.78612e-06, b=0.829763并显示两条预测线几乎彼此重叠。

为了获得更好的曲线拟合体验,您可能会发现lmfithttps://lmfit.github.io/lmfit-py/)很有用(是的,我是第一作者,有偏见)。使用lmfit,您的适合范围可能是:

import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
import  matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from lmfit import Model

x=[164000,400,13000,700,57000,108,12000]
y=[0.011970,0.000098,0.066100,0.004300,0.042600,0.000061,0.002858 ]

def f(x, a, b):
    return np.log(a*x**b)

model = Model(f)
params = model.make_params(a=1.e-6, b=0.9)
result = model.fit(np.log(y), params, x=x)

print(result.fit_report())

px = np.linspace(10,1000000,1000)
plt.scatter(x,y)
plt.loglog(px, np.exp(result.eval(x=px)),  color="k")
plt.show()

请注意,对于lmfit,参数将使用您的f()模型函数中的名称进行命名。这将打印出适合的报告,其中包括估计的不确定性:

[[Model]]
    Model(f)
[[Fit Statistics]]
    # fitting method   = leastsq
    # function evals   = 16
    # data points      = 7
    # variables        = 2
    chi-square         = 14.7591170
    reduced chi-square = 2.95182340
    Akaike info crit   = 9.22165592
    Bayesian info crit = 9.11347621
[[Variables]]
    a:  2.7861e-06 +/- 6.3053e-06 (226.31%) (init = 1e-06)
    b:  0.82976271 +/- 0.25700150 (30.97%) (init = 0.9)
[[Correlations]] (unreported correlations are < 0.100)
    C(a, b) = -0.958

并产生一个图enter image description here

© www.soinside.com 2019 - 2024. All rights reserved.